Stadia Magazine
  • News
    • A-E
      • Architecture & Design
      • Audio Systems
      • Branding, Broadcasting & Naming Rights
      • Broadcasting Infrastructure
      • Catering & Concessions
      • Communications Infrastructure
      • Engineering & Construction
    • F-N
      • Field Lighting
      • Floorings & Protective Coatings
      • IT Systems Integration
      • Naming Rights
      • Natural Turf
      • New Project
    • O-R
      • Off-Pitch Lighting
      • Renovation & Refurbishment
      • Retail & Entertainment Design
      • Roofing Materials & Technologies
    • S-Z
      • Screens & Visual Displays
      • Seating, Luxury Suites & Premium Seats
      • Security, Ticketing & Access Control
      • Sports Surfaces
      • Stadium Sustainability
      • Synthetic Turf
      • Tournament Venue
  • Features
  • Online Magazines
    • March 2025
    • October 2023
    • March 2023
    • October 2022
    • Archive Issues
    • Subscribe Free!
  • Opinion
  • Videos
  • Podcast
  • Webinars
  • Supplier Spotlight
  • Jobs
    • Browse Industry Jobs
    • Post a Job – It’s FREE!
    • Manage Jobs (Employers)
LinkedIn YouTube X (Twitter)
LinkedIn
Subscribe to Magazine Subscribe to Email Newsletter Media Pack
Stadia Magazine
  • News
      • Architecture & Design
      • Audio Systems
      • Branding, Broadcasting & Naming Rights
      • Broadcasting Infrastructure
      • Catering & Concessions
      • Communications Infrastructure
      • Engineering & Construction
      • Field Lighting
      • Floorings & Protective Coatings
      • IT Systems Integration
      • Naming Rights
      • Natural Turf
      • New Project
      • Off-Pitch Lighting
      • Renovation & Refurbishment
      • Retail & Entertainment Design
      • Roofing Materials & Technologies
      • Screens & Visual Displays
      • Seating, Luxury Suites & Premium Seats
      • Security, Ticketing & Access Control
      • Sports Surfaces
      • Stadium Sustainability
      • Synthetic Turf
      • Tournament Venue
  • Features
  • Online Magazines
    1. March 2025
    2. October 2023
    3. March 2023
    4. October 2022
    5. Archive Issues
    6. Subscribe Free!
    Featured
    31st March 2025

    March 2025 issue is out NOW!

    Online Magazines By Saul Wordsworth
    Recent

    March 2025 issue is out NOW!

    31st March 2025

    October 2024 issue is out NOW!

    28th October 2024

    In this Issue – March 2024

    9th April 2024
  • Opinion
  • Videos
  • Podcast
  • Webinars
  • Supplier Spotlight
  • Jobs
    • Browse Industry Jobs
    • Post a Job – It’s FREE!
    • Manage Jobs (Employers)
LinkedIn YouTube
Stadia Magazine
Architecture & Design

Dubai to build underwater tennis arena?

Matt RossBy Matt Ross15th May 20154 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email

Architectural firm 8 + 8 Concept Studio has released a series of renderings for an underwater tennis court in Dubai that features a transparent, curved glass roof designed to keep water out and allow players and spectators to see fish swimming above.

Designed by Krzysztof Kotala, owner of Warsaw-based 8 + 8 Concept Studio, the Polish architect is currently looking for investors to turn the unconventional idea into reality and believes it could have strong commercial potential. “This will be something original. It should be somewhere where there is a tradition of tennis. Dubai is the perfect place for this idea.”

However some engineers have warned that such a design could be prohibitively expensive and extremely difficult to realize. Sarah Fray, director of engineering and technical services at the Instituiton of Structural Engineers in London, told MailOnline that one of the biggest challenges would be to create a large span of glass to cover the court. She said this would have to be at least 108ft wide to accommodate the court and spectators.

Currently, flat panels of glass can be manufactured in single pieces around 32ft long but new machinery would have to be invented to make larger panes of curved glass, the type of which would be needed for the design.

“The more joints there are, the more likely it would leak,” Fray said. “The design would also need to be thought out in terms of how it would react to an impact. Any boat would have to be kept well clear and a dropped anchor would destroy it,” she warned, adding that the design would have to withstand earthquakes and tsunamis too.

“The technological challenges are big, but the human challenges are bigger,” she said, explaining that there would have to be a way for the structure to be connected to the surface and easily evacuate people in the event of an emergency.

However, she conceded that the arched shape of the underwater court is the best way of resisting pressure, the likes of which would be vast, particularly if the court was submerged at a decent depth beneath the waves.

“The arch is the right sort of structural shape but the challenge of making technology to create huge pieces of glass for a stadium event is enormous – and the glass would weigh possibly a hundred tons. It would also have to be incredibly thick to cope with the pressure exerted by the water.”

If funds were raised to build the arena it would be difficult to construct and would have to be built ‘wet’, she explained. “You’d have to construct a watertight base, sit the glass on top and seal it and then pump the water out.”

Ms Fray said that while getting the court into position there would be feasible, constructing and moving the materials above the waves would be a monumental challenge and cost an incredible amount of money. “I would be surprised if someone could afford to do this,” she said, adding, “It would make Wimbledon’s retracting roof quite cheap [in comparison]”.

There is also the question of whether, if built, the stadium would be any good for a game of tennis. “I don’t know if you could play tennis in it – there’s light refracting above and I don’t know how you’d control it,” she said. “I can’t imagine players not finding the fish distracting either.”

Will Stewart, a fellow of the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) said that the design may not appear as bright inside as the concept images suggest. He explained the glass would have to be many feet thicker at the edges than at the center of the arch, so views of the ocean would not be as bright as they are in the concept pictures.

“Water in general and seawater in particular is not colorless, meaning that the outside may look murky. Pure water is greeny blue, seawater varies but is more colored,” he told MailOnline.

“For this reason it gets dark quite quickly as you go down in the sea, so the depth of water would have to be more limited than the diagrams suggest if the court was not to be totally dark.”

May 15, 2015

Share. Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Email
Previous ArticleAtlanta Braves reveals ballpark hotel plan
Next Article Los Angeles FC plans USA’s most expensive privately financed soccer stadium
Matt Ross

Related Posts

New Project

Malaysia offers first glimpse of Shah Alam Sports Complex

12th June 20253 Mins Read
New Project

Oakland Athletic sets date for breaking ground on new $1.75b Vegas stadium

12th June 20252 Mins Read
New Project

Chicago soccer club announces $650m stadium build in vacant railyard

5th June 20252 Mins Read
Latest Posts

Malaysia offers first glimpse of Shah Alam Sports Complex

12th June 2025

NBA’s Miami Heat chooses L-Acoustics to enhance game-day experience

12th June 2025

Oakland Athletic sets date for breaking ground on new $1.75b Vegas stadium

12th June 2025
Supplier Spotlights
Our Social Channels
  • LinkedIn
Getting in Touch
  • Weekly News Emails
  • Meet the Editors
  • Contact Us
  • Media Pack
Related Topics
  • Auditoria
FREE WEEKLY NEWS EMAIL!

Get the 'best of the week' from this website direct to your inbox every Tuesday


© 2023 Mark Allen Group Ltd | All Rights Reserved
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.